When faced with a moral dilemma, which approach suggests choosing the action that maximizes good outcomes?

The approach that suggests choosing the action that maximizes good outcomes is rooted in consequentialism, which is focused on the results or consequences of actions. Rather than adhering to set rules or duties, consequentialists evaluate the morality of an action based on its outcomes. Therefore, when faced with a moral dilemma, this framework would guide individuals to select the option that they believe would lead to the best overall results, thus promoting the greatest amount of good.

Utilitarianism is a specific form of consequentialism that further emphasizes maximizing utility, particularly in terms of happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. Although closely related and often overlapping with consequentialism, utilitarianism is more focused on the principle of achieving the greatest good for the greatest number, directly linking it to outcomes.

Deontology, in contrast, is based on rule-based ethics, which focus on the adherence to moral rules or duties rather than the consequences of an action. Similarly, virtue ethics centers on the character and virtues of the individual carrying out the action, rather than the outcomes of the actions themselves. Thus, it does not prioritize maximizing good outcomes in the same way that consequentialism does.

In summary, the correct answer highlights the focus on consequences and good outcomes, making it the most